<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sketches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://erickoch.ca/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://erickoch.ca</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:58:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Politics and Theology: The Metaphysics of the Canadian Party System by P.</title>
		<link>http://erickoch.ca/2012/02/08/politics-and-theology-the-metaphysics-of-the-canadian-party-system/#comment-3619</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://erickoch.ca/?p=2770#comment-3619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that I cannot agree to &quot;assume&quot;  that liberals are left, conservatives right, and their responses predicated on this basis.  Summaries of this sort deny individual thoughful response. Many people would be interested in discovering if there was a way to create artificial intelligence (though once it occurs, is it artificial?).  And I think what you are labelling &#039;conservative&#039; is more &#039;religious&#039; or &#039;fundamentalist.&#039;  There are many fine thinkers along the spectrum - and I have to say when I hear &#039;liberal&#039; these days, political opportunist comes to mind - not open inquiry or interest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that I cannot agree to &#8220;assume&#8221;  that liberals are left, conservatives right, and their responses predicated on this basis.  Summaries of this sort deny individual thoughful response. Many people would be interested in discovering if there was a way to create artificial intelligence (though once it occurs, is it artificial?).  And I think what you are labelling &#8216;conservative&#8217; is more &#8216;religious&#8217; or &#8216;fundamentalist.&#8217;  There are many fine thinkers along the spectrum &#8211; and I have to say when I hear &#8216;liberal&#8217; these days, political opportunist comes to mind &#8211; not open inquiry or interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

