Tag Archives: Fidel Castro

The Triumph of Capitalism

“In the Soviet Union, capitalism triumphed over Communism; in this country, capitalism over democracy.” — The American author Fran Lebowitz, quoted in the New Yorker, May 16.

With reference to the United States, is this true?

Yes, if one equates capitalism with money and thinks, for example, of the effect of campaign contributions on the political process. However, there are many examples of popular campaigners losing to better-financed competitors. Fran Lebowitz is also right if one thinks of the recent display of outrageous greed on Wall Street and the extraordinary effectiveness of corporate lobbies in Washington.

But money can, of course, corrupt in a non-capitalist society like Fidel’s Cuba. Money and power.

But she is wrong if one reflects that capitalism is not the same as materialism and that materialism can easily co-exist with democracy. Early in the 19th century, de Tocqueville commented on crude American materialism while being deeply impressed by American democracy.

Other quotes by Fran Lebowitz:

I’ve done the calculation and your chances of winning the lottery are identical whether you play or not.

No animal should ever jump up on the dining-room furniture unless absolutely certain that he can hold his own in the conversation.

Calling a taxi in Texas is like calling a rabbi in Iraq.

Polite conversation is rarely either.

Radio news is bearable. This is due to the fact that while the news is being broadcast, the disk jockey is not allowed to talk.

Remember that as a teenager you are in the last stage of your life when you will be happy to hear the phone is for you.

Success didn’t spoil me. I’ve always been insufferable.

What do Alan Greenspan and Fidel Castro Have in Common?

Both recanted – Greenspan partially, Castro ambiguously. However, both surprised the world by expressions of misgivings unimaginable when they had power.

In hearings in the House of Representatives during the second month of the market meltdown of 2008, Greenspan testified that he had “found a flaw” in his market ideology, and conceded that he had been “partially” wrong in opposing regulation of derivatives.

Castro was asked last week whether Cuba’s model of Soviet-style communism was still worth exporting. “The Cuban model doesn’t work even for us any more,” he told Geoffrey Goldberg of the Atlantic (pictured here with Castro) Later, when Castro was asked whether he meant that the state played too big a role in the Cuban economy, he replied, “Just the opposite.”

He also said he regretted asking Khrushchev during the Missile Crisis to nuke the U.S.

That, at any rate, was clear.

There was a time when Alan Greenspan’s self-confidence was unshakeable. That was when he said that if people thought they understood what he said they must have misunderstood him.

In his three-hour speeches, Castro, in his day, was never cryptic. Nor was he cryptic last week when he accused President Sarkozy of carrying out a “racial holocaust” by deporting a thousand Roma from France.

Sarkozy indignantly rejected the remark as unacceptable and showing ignorance of history.

Unacceptable? Castro never meant for a second that Sarkozy would accept what he was offering.

It seems that in French, English and German the word is now generally used as an expression of extreme outrage – not mere misgivings – without reference to its literal meaning. That would have meant that the charge would be sent back because it could not be accepted.