Tag Archives: Newt Gingrich

The American Religion and the Republican Campaign

A guest posting by Richard Nielsen

Pundits as well as voters were surprised when Rick Santorum emerged from the Republican pack to challenge Mitt Romney in the Iowa caucus vote, and by Ron Paul’s strength in New Hampshire, and by the surges earlier of Michelle Bachmann, Herman Cain, Newt Gingrich and Governor Perry, along with latecomer Ambassador Jon Huntsman who has just exited the race.

What is required is a unified theory that covers and explains these events, which would have little more interest than a campaign for a Lion’s Club executive were it not for the fact that all of them think they should be President of the United States.

Any such theory must grapple with the nature of the Republican Party – a party funded by the wealthiest Americans but with a base of disaffected proletarians mobilized by an Evangelical religion. This is a marriage made in hell that can’t be disentangled without greatly diminishing the power of both parties.

What we are witnessing, therefore, is not a campaign to win the support of the American people – that may come – but an exercise designed to satisfy the base.

Governor Romney and latecomer former Ambassador Huntsman are both Mormons, a religion that spends much of its time and effort in genealogical “research” designed to prove that the Mormons are “chosen” – literally Latter Day saints.

Rick Santorum, proving his orthodoxy, emphasizes “family values,” but then proposes putting an end to contraception. It’s impossible, of course, but what the hell, this is only a primary.

Governor Perry seems content to play on the dark side, demonstrating his respect for family values by citing the number of executions that took place on his watch as Governor of Texas.

Ron Paul is by far the most interesting of the lot because he is not an Evangelical. He does not go so far as to say he isn’t – that would be suicide – but his mantra is freedom, libertarianism – blaming government for war, taxes and the limitations it places on the right to hunt. His “success” brings us closer to the truth of what is actually going on.

Harold Bloom, in his book The American Religion, and Philip Lee, a former Moderator of the Presbyterian Church in Atlantic Canada, author of Against the Protestant Gnostic, both identified the American religion as Gnostic – a Christian heresy since it believes that a special relationship to God provides them with secret knowledge; a reward for having chosen Jesus as their personal saviour – an act that unerringly guides them to the truth.

Harold Bloom felt this belief was held by most Americans, not only Christian Americans. Many of his countrymen, like Ron Paul, substitute the U.S. Constitution for the certainties of the Bible, and a belief in American exceptionalism.

Surely in a time of trouble such as this, God will not withhold his guidance to a nation to which he had shown such favour in the past.

So the candidates, poor sinners like the rest of us, are required to go before the public eighteen times so that those Republicans with a vote and some help from God can determine who is worthy and who is not.

What makes American Evangelicals so influential is that they have actually earned the respect and gratitude of the proletariat they represent. They are in many cases the only people who provide aid to those in need, compensating for the failure of their government to do so.

What is essential in this ludicrously dangerous situation is the role of the American rich in lavishly funding such a dubious enterprise in democracy, leaving the rest of us with little option but to pray that the scales will fall from the eyes of the American voter to permit them to see this charade for what it is – a conspiracy by the rich to derail the egalitarian impulses latent in all true democracies.

Does Karl Rove know something we don’t know?

Edited and abridged version of a piece by Richard Reeves in Truthdig (September 9)

So Karl Rove – the philosopher of the Republican Party – has taken on three of 8 1/2 (Palin has not declared) of his party’s candidates. True, it has been a woolly Republican campaign – a lot of fun, really – with two candidates, Bachmann and former House speaker Newt Gingrich, having to watch their top staffers walk away from the fight.

My own guess, prejudiced, if you will, is that Rove knows the Republicans are in real trouble with their “class” of 2012. His party’s candidates are throwing around words that have largely been missing since the 19th century, beginning with “treason.” Perhaps he senses that there is no way the Republicans and their tea party cousins can find a way to unite to defeat the Democrats even in rough economic times. Perhaps he wants to stay on the sidelines this time and make his own political comeback in 2016.

The Republicans may not have much to show in the coming campaign except for a well-groomed gang of extremists. Remember Barry Goldwater – wonderful man, lousy candidate. At some point in the campaign, the Republicans may have to stand up, or ’fess up, to what they have been doing.

Their troubles may have begun when their Senate leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, said the party’s job was to spend four years making sure that President Obama fails, that he is a one-term president. (Bachmann has since taken up that chant.)

Is that any way to run a country? Republicans are basically saying they want the president – and the country – to fail so that they can take it over.

Rove may be on to that. If he is a true Republican, and he is, he may be trying to warn the rest of the party that it is headed for more trouble than it thinks next year.