Tag Archives: work

Thinking (Again) About Work and Leisure

Work is in decline. More and more people drop out of the work force, more or less permanently, and live without a steady job – this apart from unemployment, which is a separate issue.

Leisure time is spreading from the bottom up. Long hours are increasingly the province of the rich.

The rich have less leisure time than the rest of society.

From those who have dropped out of the work force – whether by compulsion or by choice – one hears few complaints that they have too much leisure. The reason is that in fact they have little leisure; the “post-work time” is spent finding ways to make money needed to maintain their standard of living.

Even at a disappointing growth rate, our society will be richer in 2050 than it is now.

The decline in work carries a grave psychological cost. Jobs provide structure to people’s lives. Still, we have gained a world where steady work is less necessary for human survival than ever before.

The demand for manual labour is shrinking, the demand for skilled labour is increasing.

Leisure was not a problem on which Karl Marx concentrated. Work was. He was not looking forward to a post-work society. For Marx, to be human was to work. But under capitalism, labour was necessarily estranged, foreign to one’s existence; too many people had to spend too many hours every week doing something stupid and meaningless.

Marx could not anticipate the decline of work we are witnessing today, but he did understand that fulfillment, rather than the satisfaction of appetites, should be our main objective.

Sources: The Leisure Riots, a novel by Eric Koch; World Without Work, by Ross Douthat, in The New York Times (February 23); Karl Marx and the Semantics of a “Post-Work Left”, by Eva Burger, published in Jacobin and cited in Salon, March 2

Suppose the Jobs have Disappeared Forever…

Long before the rise of China and India, the question was raised in the West whether one day we may have to keep our economies humming with a fraction of the work force. It was a natural question to ask at a time when robots and other labour-saving devices, up to then the prerogative of writers of science fiction, were becoming real. And now, with China and the others in the picture, the question has become doubly acute.

The U.K., the birthplace of the industrial revolution, now produces not much more than shoes and television programs. As manufacturing went down, the service sector took its place, so much so that the new British government is embarking on wholesale reforms under the name of The New Society without giving a return to manufacturing any priority at all. In the U.S., there is greater awareness of the need to become competitive again. In France and Germany, manufacturing has not declined to the same extent.

The time has not yet come to contemplate a global division of labour, with the East providing the goods and the U.S. and the U.K. the services. But it may come, in which case we would have an interesting neo-imperialist situation in which the Anglo-Saxons exercise their brains and the Easterners their brains and their muscles.

The fact remains that, for the moment, we have to face the likelihood that many of our unemployed will not have a job to go back to. (A good thing that the work force is shrinking anyway because it is growing older.) If this is true, the state would have to find the means to support many millions, however impossible this may seem at the moment. It would have to do so to prevent blood in the streets.

Non-material considerations would prove vital. Opinion leaders might well be advised to give this possibility some attention now. The concept of work would have to be redefined, to embrace activities beyond those that are paid for or are required for subsistence, such as housework. There is never a shortage of social needs; volunteerism would have to count as work. Sports and leisure activities of all kinds, including the cultivation of the arts, would acquire new significance, and so would the role of the churches.

The area that would require particular attention is education. Our institutions would have to be conditioned to train large sections of the community to enable citizens to engage in intellectual activities for their own sake, and not merely because they are useful.

It may not be altogether absurd to conjecture that it was to serve these purposes that – unwittingly – the social media were invented.