A guest posting by Jeffrey Dvorkin, Director of the Journalism program at the University of Toronto, Scarborough Campus
It’s a truism to say that audiences are being fragmented and distracted by the wealth of offerings in media. Offered everything from the horrors in Syria to cat videos, it’s amazing that our culture’s propensity to ADD isn’t worse.
I urge my undergraduate students in Journalism to focus, focus, focus on what’s important. They tell me that it’s almost impossible to do so.
One young woman in her first year told me that she finds physical contact with newspapers revolting (I think she called them “euuww”). “Dirty, grey and confusing.” When I suggested she read online, she replied, “I tried that but I get distracted.”
What’s distracting her?
“YouTube,” she replied.
This is a media savvy generation, but even in a university journalism program, these students don’t understand what the news is for.
Eventually they do “get it”. And my brilliant but distracted student has gone on to graduate with an honours degree in journalism. She is now in law school having decided journalism was not for her.
And she’s not the only one.
Increasingly I’m seeing young journalists who try to make a go of it. After a few years they see journalism as less promising than it first appeared.
Partly this is because the business of journalism is more about the “business” than about the “journalism.”
This is a side effect of the “app culture.” Media organizations are looking for the next big thing in technology that will miraculously aggregate audiences and bring back advertisers. This is a new form of magical thinking.
The “app culture” has its benefits: newsrooms now employ fewer people who do the jobs that specialists once did. They are younger than ever. Smarter too. Also cheaper. They’ll work for lower wages with fewer protections and benefits. Even in union shops. This is a new form of digital sharecropping.
So hence the reliance on unpaid internships.
Many media organizations, especially those whose profit margins are thin, claim to be helping young people get a start in the business. The exploitation of these people has not gone unnoticed by some governments. In Ontario, the Ministry of Labour has ordered two local magazines to stop hiring unpaid interns, mostly the scions of wealthy parents who can afford their children’s efforts.
The son of a friend (who tried journalism and left) wrote to say:
“…journalism’s biggest problem: it has been devalued by society and the business side of media. That may never be fixed properly. And right or wrong, it’s no way to make a living. So the smart kids work where they get paid: finance first, technology second. That cycle, of drawing inferior brains to an already diminished product, will be fatal.”
YouTube has done its job well. To paraphrase Daniel Patrick Moynihan when he described anti-social behaviour – it’s now the digital cultural that is driving deviance downward.
Eric Koch’s new book, New Beginnings, was launched on September 20. The book is available from 
Jeff, you’ve provided more evidence that Marshall McLuhan was a keen observer, prophetic and sadly correct.
http://www.provenmodels.com/18/four-laws-of-media/marshall-mcluhan
So where will we go to find succinct, truthful and well-written commentaries? (Other than Eric’s blog of course!)
In order to read well-written commentaries we will have to read books, even on our electronic devices.
When I taught journalism at Western University (formerly known as University of Western Ontario), a woman in my class kept telling me “I have to get a good mark because I am going to law school after this!” Does not seem to be uncommon. Western for a time had a program for aboriginal journalists. Many of them switched to law school once admitted. Not sure what it all means but it may be a sign of an immature country where journalism is not sufficiently valued. French Canada seems to be an exception to that. I find Francophone journalists more serious and better educated as I observe them in a media relations role.