Tag Archives: Rousseau

Philanthropic Lies versus Misanthropic Honesty

The preference of the Spanish philosopher Javier Goma Lanzon:

“For centuries people were expected not to be honest, but virtuous. In the 18th century, however, these people, Rousseau and Goethe among them, decided that their only duty was to be ‘themselves.’

“Since then the most shameless and impertinent individuals enjoy almost complete impunity by openly advertising that they simply are what they are, and the rest of us are forced to patiently endure the consequences of their eager confessions.

“Molière made fun of the excesses of this stance in Misanthrope. I agree with him, today more than ever. We need therapeutic dissimulation, the occasional buckling and relenting, the pious lies that make life endearing, because they let us believe that both sides face each other benevolently.

“I certainly prefer the philanthropic lie to misanthropic honesty. If in the future some unsympathetic person addresses me with the words ‘Look, Javier, speaking honestly…,’ I will cut him off there and say: ‘Stop! If you want to know the truth, I would prefer you lie to me.’”

Three Cheers for the Enlightenment

In the eighteenth century, courageous and sharp thinkers like Rousseau, Diderot and Voltaire in France, and Locke, Hume and Burke in England led to the intellectual, scientific and economic leadership of Europe and America in the two centuries to come.

The countries the Enlightenment failed to reach were left behind; it reached Denmark but not Sweden, the Rhineland but not Russia, northern Italy but not southern Italy. Wherever Napoleon went, he brought it with him; the Enlightenment’s blessings invariably outlasted him. (In that sense we must regret that in 1812 he failed in Russia.) It is debatable to what extent Frederick the Great brought it to Prussia, Joseph II to the Habsburg empire. Alas, it failed to reach the Ottomans and Latin America. The Far East managed without.

Quebec, which remained loyal to the ancien regime, chose to reject the enlightening benefits of the French Revolution and had to wait until the nineteen sixties to catch up.

What is the relevance of all this?

That we must hope that the current turmoil in the Muslim world will produce an Enlightenment of its own.