A guest posting by Horace Krever
Analyses of humour are, for the most part, themselves devoid of humour and unsatisfying. Often humour shows up in unexpected contexts. A not uncommon place is a newspaper headline. Here are two favourite examples, the first in a report of a medical discipline case: “Columnist Gets Urologist in Trouble with His Peers”.
The second is in a newspaper story about an injunction temporarily preventing the US Navy from dismissing 11 recruits who proved to be HIV-positive: “Judge Bars Discharges of Seamen in AIDS Cases”.
A different example is in one of the most delightful book reviews ever written. It is a review of D.H. Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover and appeared in the magazine Field and Stream. Here it is in its entirety:
“This pictorial account of the day-to-day life of an English gamekeeper is full of considerable interest to outdoor minded readers, as it contains many passages on pheasant-raising, the apprehending of poachers, ways to control vermin, and other chores and duties of the professional gamekeeper. Unfortunately, one is obliged to wade through many pages of extraneous material in order to discover and savour those sidelights on the management of a midland shooting estate, and in this reviewer’s opinion the book cannot take the place of J.R. Miller’s Practical Gamekeeping.”
The sources of these quotations are Philip Howard, The State of the Language; English Observed (page 54), an unidentifiable newspaper clipping in my possession, and Richard Kenin & Justin Wintle (Eds.), The Dictionary of Biographical Quotation (page 475), Lawrence, David Herbert.