Tag Archives: Michael Bloomberg

The New Mayor of New York: A Victory of Populism over Plutocracy

Bill-de-BlasioInequality is a dominating theme in contemporary politics. That is why the election of Bill de Blasio in New York is significant. A majority of the voters want a change from the One Percenter – Michael Bloomberg.

In an essay that appeared in The New York Times on November 1, the writer Cynthia Freeland – the Liberal candidate in the coming by-election in Toronto Centre – analyzes the current battle between Plutocrats and Populists. She quotes two business writers, Matthew Bishop and Michael Green, who have coined the phrase “philanthrocapitalism” to describe a novel approach in which plutocrats flex their political muscle: activist engagement with public policy and social problems. Bloomberg is a philanthrocapitalist. So are Bill Gates and George Soros. However respected and admired they are, radical ideas, particularly ideas explicitly hostile to elites and technocratic intellectuals, are gaining traction. It is in that light that de Blasio’s victory must be seen.

“As this populist wave crashes in on both sides of the Atlantic,” writes Cynthia Freeland, “the plutocrats, for all their treasure and their intellect, are in a weak position to hold it back….

“People might not mind that if the political economy were delivering for society as a whole. But it is not: wages for 70 percent of the work force have stagnated, unemployment is high and many people with jobs feel insecure….

“And for more and more people, technocratic paternalism seems at best weak broth and at worst an effort to preserve the rules of a game that is rigged in their favor. More radical ideas, particularly ideas explicitly hostile to elites and technocratic intellectuals, gain. Mr. de Blasio will be the next mayor of New York because he built a constituency among those who are losing out and those who sympathize with them. Politics in the winner-take-all economy don’t have to be extremist and nasty, but they have to grow out of, and speak for, the 99 percent. The pop-up political movements that come so naturally to the plutocrats won’t be enough.”

Goldman Sachs — A Benefactor of Humanity

The Globe and Mail reported on August 2 that Goldman Sachs will invest almost $10 million (U.S.) in a New York City jail program that will allow the investment firm to profit if it can reduce recidivism rates.

The move makes New York the first city in the nation to test “social impact bonds” that enlist private entities in an effort to save governments money over the long term.

The Daily Beast comments: “Utilizing a social-service bond – a new financial instrument – the most notorious investment bank will put $10 million into a program to cut the recidivism rate at New York City’s Rikers Island prison. The bond will be backed by a guarantee from Bloomberg Philanthropies, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s philanthropic arm. For Goldman to get its money back on the deal, recidivism at the prison has to drop by at least 10 percent. If it falls lower than that, Goldman could make $2.1 million on its investment.”

On November 4, 2011, the activist Chris Hedges was one of at least fifteen demonstrators arrested when he participated in a demonstration outside the company’s headquarters. They had stated that “since the formal mechanisms of power refuse to restore the rule of law, then we, the 99 percent, will have to see that justice is done.”

Is it possible that Goldman Sachs invented a new financial instrument in response?