Tag Archives: Iran

The Grilling of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

On Tuesday, the Iranian president appeared in parliament to answer questions from MPs. Mr. Ahmadinejad took an hour to respond to a long list of questions about his foreign and domestic policy decisions.

He insisted they had been in accordance with the law, and denied that he had challenged the authority of the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

The president’s final words caused some uproar in the chamber.

“It was not a very difficult quiz,” he told the MPs, “To me, those who designed the questions were from among those who got a master’s degree by just pushing a button. If you had consulted us, better questions could have been drawn up.”

The president added that he deserved top marks. “Be fair. Any grade of less than 20 [out of 20] will be rude.”

• • • • •

Mr. Ahmadinejad should have been asked this question:

“What have you done about the low birth rate in our country? Usually, high religious observance and low income go along with high birth rates. But, our country now has a birth rate similar to the least fertile region in the U.S. – New England. Don’t you think your government should have devised incentives for women to have more babies?”

To maintain his grades of twenty-twenty he should have answered:

“If I had not been so busy dealing with the lies the West is spreading about us, I would have already done what I am now going to do. I will follow in the footsteps of General de Gaulle. When faced with a declining birth rate in his country, he appointed a ten-men board to remedy the situation. I will do the same. I will be the chairman of the board.”

Sources: Associated Press, BBC, U.S. Census Bureau, David Brooks: The Fertility Implosion, N.Y. Times

The Iranian Nuclear Program — Three Perspectives

Iran wants, at the very least, to put itself in a position where it has the expertise and materials with which to build deliverable nuclear weapons quickly. It may well want, at some point, to develop the bombs themselves. This is deeply worrying to Israel, which is threatened by Iran’s proxies in Lebanon and Gaza, and disgusted by the anti-Semitic rants of Iran’s leaders. It also alarms Arab states, which fear Iranian power (and their own Shiite minorities). That alarm could lead some of them – Saudi Arabia, Egypt, perhaps Turkey – to seek nuclear weapons of their own. Many fear that this would make the region even less stable than it is. Even if it did not, it would make the possible consequences of instability much more terrible. — The Economist (February 29)

• • • • •

While evidence suggests that Iran continues to make progress toward a nuclear weapons program, American intelligence officials believe that there is no hard evidence that Iran has decided to build a nuclear bomb. But the possibility that Israel will launch a pre-emptive strike has become a focus of American policy makers and is expected to be a primary topic when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel meets with President Obama at the White House on Monday. — The New York Times (February 29)

• • • • •

Most experts agree that Israel could hit multiple targets in Iran and do considerable damage to its nuclear program. They would, however, do much less damage than a full-scale US attack using all of the resources at Washington’s disposal.

The Israelis would be operating at the very limits of their capabilities. “If they pulled it off,” says Douglas Barrie, senior fellow for military aerospace at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) in London, “it would be an impressive display of power projection against a difficult and dispersed set of targets.”

Only a small number of air forces in the world, he notes, could mount such an operation. But, Mr. Barrie stresses: “Even if successful, it would only delay Iran’s nuclear program.”

That’s a view shared for now by Israel’s most important ally.

Only a few days ago, the Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of staff said that an Israeli attack would not be prudent.

Such a strike, he said, “would be destabilizing and would not achieve their long-term objectives.”

However, Israel’s calculus is very different. Knowing all their operational limitations, might they launch such an operation anyway? — Jonathan Marcus, BBC (February 27)