Tag Archives: WWI

Germany Nearly Won WWI. Why Didn’t It?

In the spring of 1918, victory seemed to be within the Kaiser’s grasp. Allied troops were war weary. There were mutinies in the French army involving more than 40,000 men. U-boats were sinking an average of half a million tons of shipping bringing supplies to Britain. At the battle of Caporetto, 260,000 Italians had surrendered to the Austro-Hungarians and 400,000 fled. Russia was out of the war.

With a superiority of more than two to one in men and guns, the Germans launched their spring offensive on March 21, firing more than three million rounds on the first day. The long stalemate in the West was broken. On April 9, a further German attack was followed by an advance on Paris, creating panic in the city. By the end of June, the Allied military leadership was traumatized. Three months later the Germans were suing for peace.

The first reason for the astonishing reversal had to with military intelligence. The Germans never established an effective espionage network behind Allied lines. The Allies on the other hand were well prepared for German attacks after the initial ones.

The second reason: the war in the air was now being won by the allies. It extended well beyond the front lines. By the summer of 1918, the Allies produced many more planes than the Germans who no longer had sufficient raw materials.

Third, there was a shift in the balance of power where the gas war was concerned.

Fourth, by the summer, the Allies changed their offensive tactics, using artillery not to obliterate but to neutralize pin-pointed enemy positions.

Finally, the economy and the home front. The Allies out-produced the Central powers dramatically, and the Allied blockade cut off essential agricultural products. By 1918, the death rate among women in Germany was nearly a quarter higher than before the war. Conditions were even worse in Austria-Hungary where soldiers were often weak from hunger. In Bulgaria, mass starvation was averted only by American grain deliveries after the armistice.

When it became apparent that a military victory had eluded the Germans, they were paralyzed; the possibility of anything other than complete victory had never occurred to them. They had believed their own propaganda. Moreover, they were terrified of a revolution at home.

Another reason for the sudden collapse was Germany’s tendency to give excessive influence to technicians consumed by hubris. They were inadequately restrained by politicians whose judgment was generally superior.

Source: Richard J. Evans review of David Stevenson’s With Our Backs to the Wall (London Review of Books, December 15, 2025)

Lloyd George and the Appeasement of Hitler

David Lloyd George was the Churchill of WWI, prime minister since 1916 when he pledged “to win the war at any cost.” He was, in 1919, together with Georges Clemenceau and Woodrow Wilson, a leading architect of the Treaty of Versailles.

A radical Liberal, Lloyd George had risen from humble beginnings in Wales, thanks to a brilliant mind, extraordinary political gifts, unusual charm and a remarkable oratorical talent. When describing his personality, Margaret MacMillan, the author of Paris 1919, who happens to be his great granddaughter, also mentioned an uncanny ability to know what other people were thinking. He had that in common with Hitler.

In the ’thirties, when Lloyd George was in his seventies, he believed that Hitler was “really a great man” and the “greatest German of the age.” On September 4, 1936, he visited Hitler at his Eagle’s Nest in Berchtesgaden. The Führer greeted him, seizing an outstretched hand warmly between his own. In the words of Stella Rudman, the author of Lloyd George and the Appeasement of Germany, 1919–1945, he “assumed the demeanour of a distinguished uncle reunited with his favorite nephew.”

There are a number of explanations:

1. Once out of power, but still a member of Parliament, Lloyd George had become increasingly mischievous and a great nuisance to a succession of governments. He was frequently denounced for his “cynicism” and “defeatism.”

2. He was far from the only member of the British elite, though not of the traditional upper class, who was impressed by Hitler.

3. He was senile.

4. The British did not know what to do with their elder statesmen.

5. By far the most cogent explanation is that he felt culpable for the harshness of the Treaty of Versailles and did not blame Hitler for doing everything he could to undo it. There is no question that in Paris in 1919 Lloyd George tried hard to moderate the terms, but could not prevail over Clemenceau.

Margaret MacMillan quotes his private secretary, Philip Kerr (page 196):

“He will stand no more nonsense either from French or Americans. He is taking the long view about the Peace, & insists that it should be one that will not leave bitterness for years to come & probably lead to another war.”

However, Lloyd George signed the treaty and suffered afterwards from such severe remorse that it led to total, inexcusable delusion.

Based on a review by Will Robinson in the Times Literary Supplement, October 7